Rayman Origins lands in the UK

Michel Ancel, who has previously designed Rayman and Beyond Good & Evil, has also worked on the creation of Rayman Origins, a game which has just reached the shores of UK

Ubisoft has announced the release of the game, Rayman Origins, in the UK on the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii.
Rayman Origins features incredible graphics matching the level of detail and quality of the biggest animated movies, gameplay both accessible and challenging and an original soundtrack.
It’s an interactive game, created by Michel Ancel, with all characters and environments designed by professional artists. The game features a detailed and vibrant universe, six different worlds and more than 60 levels, where each element is meant to feel organic.
The game is a single-player, as well as playable with up to four players, where gamers can play Rayman, Globox or one of two Teensies.
Gamers are also challenged to find all secret areas and access the bonus “Land of the Dead” world.
A free demo of the game is also available for download on the Xbox Live Arcade and the PlayStation Network.
What games have you been playing lately? Let us know via the comments box or through Twitter and Facebook.

Source:http://www.t3.com/news/rayman-origins-lands-in-the-uk

Share

11-11-11

I was planning on doing a seasonal sports wrap-up, but I’ve decided that might be a little tricky, as the season has not actually wrapped up yet. Volleyball and soccer just keep winning! Of course, by the time this is printed, it might all be over, but what can I do? There’s always pro sports. On the other hand, hockey has only just started, the Cardinals just won the World Series, and the NBA is still in a lockout, although that might change soon. College hoops doesn’t start for a couple more days, and football is… football. So sports will have to wait.

Hey, guess what Friday is. It’s 11-11-11. You probably knew that. It’s also our Homecoming, and Skyrim comes out. But I had to wonder if there’s any significance behind it. First of all, there’s a movie coming out called 11-11-11. Looks pretty creepy to me. Anyway, in the movie, characters sometimes suffer from 11:11 syndrome: A semi-fictitious tendency people have to look at the clock more at 11:11 AM or PM than at almost all other times. When I first researched this, naturally I was inclined to check the clock. Yeah, it was 11:11 PM. No joke.

In the ancient to medieval days, back when there was tons of superstition, “prophets” placed values on numbers. While most doubt the credibility of these, the number 11 had a surprisingly popular trend – of being ominous. That’s right. A thousand years ago, 11 was an absolutely horrible number. No redeeming qualities whatsoever. In roughly four days from the moment that I’m writing these words, the time will be 11:11 PM with 11 seconds on 11-11-11. I wonder if this is like 12-21-12 for the Mayans but instead for the Romans or wherever these people came from.

Eleven is the number of soccer players per team on a field. It’s also the atomic number for sodium. Many people resent the number 11 as at that point, counting on one’s fingers becomes extremely difficult. And if you ask the wrong person, it’s the sum of 1 and 1.

Those are my scattered, mediocrely-researched thoughts about 11:11 at 11-11-11. Basketball has just started, so with that and the end of fall sports, expect the next Sports N’ Stuff to actually have SA sports. That’s that.

Source: http://my.hsj.org/Schools/Newspaper/tabid/100/view/frontpage/articleid/474078/newspaperid/4515/111111.aspx

Share

SEA Games: Singapore complete clean sweep in table tennis

Feng Tianwei (file picture)
JAKARTA: Before they went into action here at the 26th SEA Games, Team Singapore’s table tennis stars walked the playing hall and the streets without any fuss.
It was a very different story on Wednesday.

The team of eight were mobbed by local fans at the Soemantri Brodjonegoro Sports Complex after sweeping all five of the gold medals on offer in table tennis.

It was an all-Singapore affair on the final day of table tennis, with world No 4 Feng Tianwei claiming the gold medal in the women’s singles and Gao Ning emerging as the men’s singles champion.

Feng, 25, proved too good for her younger team-mate, Isabelle Li, the 17-year-old debutant.

There was tremendous support for the two Singapore women in the stands, that also featured a contingent of Team Singapore supporters, including chef-de-mission Dr Tan Eng Liang.

Feng was never troubled, wrapping up the final 4-0 (11-3, 11-4, 11-9, 11-5) in 35 minutes.

Said the defending champion, who also picked up a gold in the women’s doubles: “I think today Isabelle was not so used to my style and I played better and was more steady.

“Isabelle is a player with a lot of promise. She’s good and she just needs to work on her aggression and attack.”

Feng returns to Singapore on Thursday before departing for London on November 21 to compete in the ITTF Pro Tour Grand Finals.

Watched by her family members and friends, last year’s Youth Olympic Games silver medallist Isabelle was delighted to finish second on her debut.

“There is still a gulf in standard between us, and it was a hard match for me. This is my first time competing against Tianwei and it was a very special moment for me playing against a world champion and world No 4,” said the teenager.

In the men’s singles final that followed, it was sweet revenge for veteran Gao Ning, who notched a 4-0 (11-6, 11-9, 12-10, 11-8) victory over team-mate Yang Zi. The 29-year-old had lost the Commonwealth Games gold to Yang in New Delhi last year,

Gao Ning, who claimed his third successive singles gold in the event, said: “It’s a good feeling. I think I prepared more sufficiently this time around and clinched the crucial points.”

With five golds and four silver medals from five events, table tennis is the most successful sport for Singapore here.

Selection issues had dogged the paddlers ahead of the SEA Games, as the Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA) got into a tangle with the Singapore National Olympic Council (SNOC).

It was eventually resolved, and speaking on Wednesday, STTA president Lee Bee Wah said: “I’m very proud of them, especially our younger players Xuejie and Isabelle. I think the results speak for itself … the STTA wants to groom younger players.

“In future, the policy of sending one set of senior players to get medals and another set of younger ones for development will remain (for SEA Games).”

Chef-de-mission Tan, a vice-president at the SNOC, personally congratulated Lee on the team’s success.

“Our congratulations to the paddlers and the association for winning five gold medals. They deserve our fullest and heartiest congratulations.

Source: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/sportsnews/view/1165943/1/.html

Share

Pacquiao vs Marquez Winners and Losers: Mayweather, UFC Get a Bump, and So Does Boxing

Nacho Beristain went into the Hall of Fame this year, but Saturday may have been his finest hour. (Photo by Rick Stewart/Getty Images)

Nacho Beristain went into the Hall of Fame this year, but Saturday may have been his finest hour.

As with every big fight weekend, the results and talk from the weekend have reverberated throughout the entire sports world. Regardless of the result, the weekend usually changes the landscape and gets the talk started for the next big event. Here are my personal winners and losers from the weekend.

Winners

Juan Manuel Marquez: In the eyes of many, Marquez became the greatest Mexican fighter of his era this weekend, and he is easily the biggest winner coming out of Saturday. You get the feeling if he would have gotten the victory, it would have been met with less outrage than Pacquiao winning, despite the fact it was a close fight. Juan came out looking every bit the phenom that Manny went in appearing, and essentially gave the boxing world the blueprint for beating the unbeatable. He asserted his place amongst the pound for pound kings and also bolstered his already Hall of Fame-level resume. The only thing that could have made the weekend bigger for him is if he had actually won. Where JMM goes from here is anybody’s guess. He seemed genuinely uninterested in a fourth fight against Pacquiao (money could change that) and it’s hard to blame him. In his eyes he has beaten Manny three times (twice in my opinion) and never been rewarded for it by the judges. People are suggesting a 140-pound fight against Erik Morales, and that would interest people, but a retirement wouldn’t surprise me.

Nacho Beristain: He tactically beat Freddie Roach in the fight. While some will question him telling Marquez that he had the fight in the bag, there is no denying the game plan he readied for the enigma that is/was Manny Pacquiao. Also, even after the advice, though Marquez did take the foot off the gas a little bit, it wasn’t like Manny went out guns blazing either. It could be a result of both taking that approach that the fight ended in the manner that it did, not just Nacho’s advice. Either way, Nacho came out of the weekend looking better than everybody but JMM for the great job he did in camp.

Star-divide

Floyd Mayweather Jr: The biggest winner of those not in attendance this weekend has to be Lil Floyd. By doing nothing, he watched his biggest challenger look mortal, and beatable, and now has all the reason in the world to tote his superiority. He becomes the #1 pound for pound fighter (and welterweight) in the world from his couch. Floyd could also be seen as a loser from this weekend because he may lose out on a record payday, but his point in many ways is already proven. Floyd made the statement that he is the best counter puncher ever, and while that is a lofty title, there is no denying that he is at least one of the very best. It’s hard not to see a fresher (in ring) Floyd and his style not being the favorite against Manny now.

Marquez beat Manny with movement, great timing and accurate counter punching, three things Mayweather has mastered. And now with news that the Pacquiao camp (see: Bob Arum) will not be pursuing the May 5th fight with Mayweather, he also gets the added bonus of being able to tell the world (justifiably so) that they are ducking him. While many will say this leaves Floyd with little to no options for May 5th, I think it opens the door for some very intriguing fights. A win against Sergio Martinez would be just as big a legacy-defining as a win against Pacquiao would be, and that fight is there for the taking. The other intriguing options are at 154 as well, as Mayweather could opt to take a huge fight with Canelo Alverez. At welterweight the options are slim. He could face Andre Berto, or if Amir Khan wants to jump on that sword that could be an option. An unlikely scenario is the winner of Cotto vs Margarito, but count me in the camp that says there is no way Mayweather gets to cash out against any Top Rank fighters. While Mayweather may not get to see the $50 million payday against Manny that he wants, he still will collect his standard $30 million against somebody on May 5th.

UFC: If you we’re like me, you passed on watching the first hour of the PPV you paid $65 for to watch the UFC on Fox event. It played out a lot like I expected it to, an hour-long UFC commercial with a fight in the middle. But critical acclaim (or lack thereof) isn’t why this was a winner. The event drew 5.7 million viewers, peaking at 8.8 million, making it easily the most watched UFC event ever. Even thought the fight only lasted a little more than a minute, this is a rousing success and it got more eyes than ever on their sport. I’m not one to lump the two sports together, nor do I think one’s success is the other’s demise, but this is relevant to boxing. It means there is a market on network TV for combat sports.

Boxing: Despite the disputed decision, boxing was at the forefront of the sports world for a week or so and its two biggest stars got plenty of camera time. And then, boxing delivered. Pacquiao vs Marquez was a very good card, despite the turd in the punch bowl known as Bradley vs Casamayor. Alvarado vs Prescott was excellent and Pacquiao vs Marquez was 12 great rounds of tactical action. There still is nothing in sports like a big fight, and this weekend was just another example of that. The tense air in the arena that you can just sense from your couch between exchanges, the moment right before the opening bell rings, holding your breath during exchanges wondering if the fight will end instantly — man, do I love boxing. There are a plethora of “Boxing is Dying!” paragraphs written this week in Pacquiao articles, but all ratings and viewers numbers suggest otherwise, and its something that I would assume that the diehard boxing fans don’t entertain. Many writers are also lumping MMA and boxing together lazily and I just don’t agree. The mainstream sports media seems to think boxing is to the UFC as the AFL was to the NFL. I see the boxing/MMA relationship as more similar to football and rugby. Sure, the ball looks the same, and there are elements of each sport that are similar, but ultimately they are two very different sports. All in all it was a great weekend for combat sports, as boxing and MMA most likely saw their biggest audiences of the year.

Losers

Manny Pacquiao: Strange that the “winner” of the fight is its biggest loser, but Manny undeniably took his biggest beating in the ring since, well, since his last Marquez fight, and he took an even bigger beating from the media and boxing fans. Manny became mortal Saturday night, and the ensuing response left a bad taste in a lot of peoples’ mouths. Word came out the next day that Team Pacquiao would not be pursuing a fight with Mayweather, which was perceived by many as a duck. People just expected MORE from Manny, I guess. I thought he acquitted himself well in the fight, but just was beaten by the better man. Manny leaving the post-fight presser after just two questions, and none about Marquez or Mayweather made matters worse.

The public and media’s reverence of Manny is waning. This was one of the more scathing paragraphs I read about Manny all week, via Jay Caspian Kang for Grantland:

“But then I wondered if maybe I was just being un-brainwashed about Manny Pacquiao, who achieved his invincible status by fighting a broken Oscar De La Hoya, a pretender in Ricky Hatton, a possibly broken Miguel Cotto, a thoroughly uninterested Joshua Clottey, a possibly broken Antonio Margarito, and a shot-to-all-hell Shane Mosley. After Saturday night, the angle on Manny’s past three years should shift a bit – is he the all-time great who moved up in weight or is he the smiling, marketable star of a desperate sport? Maybe he’s both? I certainly couldn’t tell – all I knew was that when HBO wasn’t carrying the fight and when I wasn’t hearing Manny Steward talk about all-time greats, Pac-Man didn’t look the same.”

Manny came out of this weekend much worse than he went in, and it will be interesting to see how he and his team respond. The early talk is they want Marquez in an immediate rematch, and while some do want to see that again, many are going to wonder aloud why he isn’t agreeing to fight Mayweather, again.

Bob Arum: Bob would have been a loser even if Manny had decisively won the fight. He had a rough week leading up to the fight, putting his foot in his mouth over and over. What made matters worse was his reaction to the fight, immediately writing off a May fight with Mayweather. Bob has taken some hits on the internet and it seems like most are just plain tired of his act. Arum will continue to draw the ire of boxing fans until he shows that he legitimately wants to make Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen.

Freddie Roach: Freddie is another act that some boxing fans (definitely count me into this group) have grown tired of, and there have been signs of some sort of schism in the Pacquiao camp before Alex Ariza went all “They shoulda listened to me all along” this week. Fact is, whatever Roach’s gameplan for Saturday was, it didn’t work, and it was apparent early on that it wouldn’t. He was never able to get Manny to make the proper adjustments. Also it seems as if the entire camp just assumed Manny would “Hatton” Marquez, and that in and of itself is a fatal flaw of the trainer. This is viewed by some as the third time that Nacho has out dueled him in the ring, and Roach came off as whiny and a sore loser after the fight. He also was part of the “We want another shot at Marquez” contingent that is causing fans to ask the same question: “If you think you won, why a rematch?” Also Freddie had a PR slip up with him telling a group of reporters that he thought Manny should have a tuneup fight next. Not exactly everything going to plan for Roach.

HBO: Watching the fight with unbiased ears, you couldn’t help but notice the biased mouths of the HBO crew. I have grown accustomed to the fact that there are story lines that the announce team (and HBO as a whole) want to push. I have come to grips with the fact that sometimes during action Jim Lampley is just going to spend a minute giving us some backstory they want us to know, rather than, you know, calling the fight. Saturday was worse, though. Between Lederman’s bogus scorecard and Lampley saying landed punches from Marquez were blocked, it seemed to me that they were very pro-Pacquiao. It wasn’t until I read some stories later that I saw I wasn’t the only one. Of course it was more beneficial for HBO that Manny win, but it doesn’t have to sound like it the whole fight. A great performance was largely ignored by the HBO team in lieu of them exaggerating the minimal success Manny was having to further their pre-determined story lines. As a whole, I don’t dislike the HBO team as much as others. I like Lampley’s penchant to hammer home an excelent line in the midst of high drama, I think Manny Steward and Roy Jones offer great insight, I enjoy some of Max Kellerman’s narratives (Larry Merchant is missing here for a reason). What I never enjoy from the HBO team is their need to spin their story lines during the fight, despite the action in the ring being different. HBO has a tendency to do this, but on Saturday they completely ignored the action in the ring to tell the “Invincible Manny Pacquiao” story. In doing so, they missed their opportunity to tell the incredible Juan Manuel Marquez story.

Source: http://www.badlefthook.com/2011/11/16/2567633/pacquiao-vs-marquez-winners-losers-mayweather-ufc-on-fox-nacho-beristain-freddie-roach-arum

Share

Formspring Launching A “Favorites” Directory, Starts Looking Like A Real Social Network

formspring-image001

Formspring is launching its first user Directory later today in an effort to better highlight the more popular and famous users of its online social Q&A service. The directory will organize users into categories like Music, Comedy, Sports & Fitness, Fashion & Beauty, Movies & TV, Tech & Start-ups and more.

Current Formspring users will be able to locate the new feature through the “find more friends” section on Formspring when it goes live today, but you can see some of the celebrity users’ pages now, assuming you know their Formspring username. For example, there’s actor Taylor Lautner, producer Jerry Bruckheimer, the bands Incubus, We The Kings, and SOH!3, Marvel Creative Director Tom Brevoort, and pop star Camryn.

At launch, the directory will feature over 100 popular users and more will be added in the weeks ahead. It will also be accessible directly via the URL formspring.me/favorites.

The new feature is meant to compliment the previously launched “Formspring Interests” initiative, which allows users to add up to six interests to their profiles like Music, Sports, Fashion & Beauty, etc. Those “interests” are now mirrored by the categories found within the new Formspring Favorites directory.

The bigger picture here is that Formspring isn’t just launching a directory, it’s taking yet another step on its way to becoming a full-fledged social network. You can see the way the company is carefully and thoughtfully building out links between its users, not only between these new interests and categories, but also through the profile page features “who made you smile” and “who you responded to.”

Formspring’s potential for disruption is that it’s not trying to build another Facebook (cough, Google+,cough), it’s trying to build a network around users’ interests. Of course, do to so, it still has to go up against Facebook’s own interest graph, based on the cumulation of millions of “likes. However, it has one slight advantage: when a Facebook brand page inserts its messaging into your social news feed, it can feel intrusive and annoying. Yet when you venture out to a destination site meant to connect you to brands, celebs, and media personalities, you both expect and desire the same sorts of interactions that may have felt “icky” or bothersome on Facebook. That could be a potential win for Formspring.

Formspring now has 27 million users and sees more than 30 million unique visitors per month. With this new direct access to celeb accounts, it wouldn’t be surprising to see that traffic increase quite a bit in the near future.

Source: http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/14/formspring-launching-a-favorites-directory-starts-looking-like-a-real-social-network/

Share

‘Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3′ lives up to expectations

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is finally here and the series signature multi-player already has me hooked. Based on first impressions, it seems like the latest installment in the award-winning franchise is the bestCall of Duty yet.

Players will immediately see the similarities between Modern Warfare 3 and its predecessor. The game runs at a liquid smooth 60 frames per second. Aiming and shooting feels sharp and accurate, and there is no aiming delay while using sniper rifles. This allows players to “quick-scope,” a sniping technique players either loved or hated in Modern Warfare 2.

While the series’ reputation for smooth gunplay is upheld in the latest installment, players will immediately notice the visuals of Call of Duty are showing their years. The game is graphically on-par with Modern Warfare 2, which was released two years ago.

This is not to say Modern Warfare 3 is a bad-looking game. It is evident that developers, Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games have put great care and creativity into the weapon models, the environments and the lighting. However, when compared to games like RageGears of War 3Uncharted 3 and (dare I mention) Battlefield 3Modern Warfare 3 just doesn’t pop.

Most of my time with Modern Warfare 3 has been in multi-player. While I’ve only logged about five hours of playtime, I can already tell this is the most fully-featured Call of Duty yet. There are tons of unlockable guns, perks and titles for players to work toward as they play the game. Players are rewarded constantly as they accumulate time online.

Adjustments to the create-a-class system make the game much more balanced. Shotguns cannot be used as secondary weapons and the new “strike-package” system allows players to assume a support role for the team.

In my limited time with Modern Warfare 3, I was able to complete the first three missions of the single-player campaign. From the moment the player begins the game, the game is an all-out adrenaline roller coaster.

Over the course of the first three levels, players will battle through the New York Stock Exchange, guide predator missiles into hordes of Russian soldiers, shoot down Russian attack helicopters while dodging and weaving through skyscrapers, blow up a Russian submarine and drive a boat through hundreds of exploding battleships.

Think of a Michael Bay movie and multiply it by 10–you’ll have a snapshot of Modern Warfare 3. While I haven’t played Modern Warfare 3 enough to give it a fair rating, it’s safe to say this game is a must-play for fans of the series. Be sure to check back for a full review next Tuesday.

Source: http://www.dailytitan.com/2011/11/10/anders3601/

Share

Stroke of genius as Ironstein finds mark

Storming home ... Ironstein takes out the Queen Elizabeth Stakes.

Storming home … Ironstein takes out the Queen Elizabeth Stakes. Photo: Paul Rovere

GERALD RYAN admitted it probably worked out for the best for Ironstein after he missed out on a run in the Melbourne Cup but picked up the Queen Elizabeth Stakes at Flemington yesterday.

”I think he might have run 10th in the Cup and we would have got our 100 grand … we get 250 [grand] for that with the bonus,” Ryan said. ”If you get in the Cup you run and [then] you’re not here [in this race] so it’s good. This was the race I always had in mind but you’re not going to turn down a run in the Melbourne Cup.”

Ironstein, 26th on the Cup order of entry, proved the strongest stayer, winning by 2¼ lengths from Shootoff with Paddy O’Reilly a similar margin away third.

Advertisement: Story continues below

Ryan said the international raiders coming to Melbourne were a highlight of the carnival for him but he believes there aren’t enough opportunities for Australian horses to run in the Melbourne Cup.

”I love them coming out from Europe, it makes the carnival,” he said. ”I just think we need to have more races here that make you exempt from the ballot. It is a hard one, I’ll leave that to someone else and be a horse trainer.”

Ironstein has proved an iron horse after he had his first run this preparation on Boxing Day last year. ”He has been fantastic,” Ryan said. ”He had his first-up run this prep last Boxing Day and he had eight days off after he won the Tatts Cup in Brisbane. I think, in his last 19 starts, he has finished out of the first five only twice.

”We could go on to next week and have a crack at two miles [in the Sandown Cup], but we’ll wait and see.”

Bauer, which was one place above Ironstein on the ballot order for the Melbourne Cup, ran fourth. The 2008 Melbourne Cup runner-up might have run his last race after being given the run of the race by Michael Rodd and failing to quicken.

”That was disappointing, everything seemed to be right going into the race and we were expecting a bit more,” part-owner Terry Henderson said. ”We’ll see how he pulls up before making any decisions.”

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/horseracing/stroke-of-genius-as-ironstein-finds-mark-20111105-1n14l.html

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/horseracing/stroke-of-genius-as-ironstein-finds-mark-20111105-1n14l.html

Share

Cassano surgery a success, says doctor

AC Milan and Italy star Antonio Cassano has had successful surgery to repair a heart defect, the doctor treating him said on Friday.

Cassano was diagnosed with a hole in his heart after suffering an ischaemic stroke last weekend.

He was operated on by Dr Mario Carminati, a specialist in cardiological congenital defects, at the Policlinico San Donato hospital in Milan.

“The operation went very well and quickly. There were no problems,” said Dr Carminati, who is considered one of the leading experts in his field in Italy.

Cassano’s condition comprises essentially an anomaly of the heart in which a small hole develops between the left and right atrium, allowing blood to escape between the two, causing turbulence that can result in blood clotting.

The procedure to close the hole took just 35 minutes, Dr Carminati said.

Cassano was taken ill on Milan’s return from Rome in the early hours of Sunday morning, following a 3-2 win over Roma.

The 29-year-old was suffering from difficulties in his speech and movement.

Nereo Bredolin of the hospital’s neurology department said the scar left by the procedure “will disappear gradually”.

Medical sources indicated that Cassano could potentially leave hospital as early as Sunday.

But he is likely to be out of action for much, if not all, of the rest of the season, placing a big question mark against any possibility of him featuring at Euro 2012 in June.

“I was very worried but his career is not at risk,” said AC Milan vice-chairman Adriano Galliani.

Source: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iYU7MHxvdXjr5Eg6H1DkxsUFpcag?docId=CNG.d8a458444a1f0fb688322c8410b26047.5d1

Share

Losing World Series hurts Rangers; so would losing C.J. Wilson

Rangers pitcher C.J. Wilson slaps...

FORT WORTH, Texas — Thanks for asking, and thanks for your concern.

But the answer is no.

I will not “move on” from Game 6, and will not accept the many offers of an intervention. I’d rather suffer than forget.

But for those who claim that a week later they are now at peace, for those who claim that 2012 has become the only priority….

More importantly, the Rangers do hope that young Neftali Feliz can move on. Or even Nelson Cruz, who did not — and this has been a ridiculous charge against Nellie — “Buckner” that line drive in right field.

He should have caught it, yes. But that ball wasn’t exactly an infield dribbler between the legs. When you’ve come as far as Nellie — given up on by four organizations, including once by the Rangers — no one should question the mental toughness.

Cruz will be fine.

But Feliz? For all the national and local second-guessing on why Ron Washington and Mike Maddux didn’t run Nefty back to the mound in the 10th inning of Game 6, the answer comes from those in the dugout.

And only those in the dugout saw Feliz’s demeanor and the look in his eyes as he trudged off the mound following the disastrous blown save in the bottom of the ninth.

“The kid had totally unraveled mentally after that inning,” said one guy. “There was no way he was ready to pitch again. If you saw him, you knew that. If you weren’t in the dugout to see that, you shouldn’t even be commenting.”

I separately talked to four members of the Rangers who were in the dugout. They all said the same thing, and none of those four was named Washington or Maddux.

Is Feliz mentally tough enough at age 22 to be directly involved in the biggest World Series disaster of all time, and bounce back?

That answer is still to come.

But a week after the infamous Game 6 Gag, it’s really not Cruz, nor Feliz, nor Darren Oliver, nor Michael Young, with his two misplays at first base, who stir the pot of discontent at the mere mention of a name.

It’s C.J. Wilson, who was never on the mound that Game 6 night in St. Louis.

The second-guessers aim heavily at Washington, most of that second-guessing being of the stupid variety, but if you want to stir up anger, nothing comes close to the mention of Wilson and his free agency the Rangers have to deal with over the next couple of months.

By my estimate, Wilson is suddenly the second most polarizing member of the local jock kingdom community. Second only to Tony Romo. It’s been suggested Dez Bryant might nose out Wilson for second place, and, admittedly, that’s a valid debate.

Regardless, the opinion from here:

Don’t hate on C.J.

Next up, all the e-mails of disagreement this morning, and probably a few mentions of that rip job from this space after the ball hit the third base bag in Detroit, and Wilson’s meltdown that followed.

OK, I hated on C.J. that game.

But if you want to look ahead, you have to first look past Wilson’s dismal postseason performance, and even the obvious truth he’s not a true No. 1 starting pitcher, or maybe even a No. 2.

Yet the schedule never changes. There will be 162 games to be played in 2012, and a team has to have success over the course of the season, and a team has to have a pitcher who can be successful over 30-plus starts before you can even contend for a postseason berth.

In Arlington, of course, there are other factors to consider. Can a pitcher handle the blast furnace of summer? Can he handle the dreaded jet stream?

Not many can, but C.J. can. In the regular season, at least.

Nobody around here should be saying they don’t want C.J. back. The Rangers certainly aren’t saying that.

Will he be back?

No. Or at least, I’d make it 50-to-1 against.

Some team, or teams, will go crazy for Wilson in the free-agency market because some team always does in the baseball wintertime.

Best guess, that team will go at least $80 million crazy.

But the Rangers have their own opinion of Wilson’s worth. Right or wrong, it’s not anywhere near $80 million. Maybe that could change, but I doubt it.

If the Rangers have a $50 million contract in mind, would they go $60 million, or higher? I don’t know what Wilson’s “hometown” discount is, and he’s said on local radio this week he will have a hometown discount, but it’s certainly not $20 mil worth of discount.

It’s not about the club being willing to spend money; it’s about an opinion on market value. The Rangers thought Cliff Lee was worth $125 million, even after he blew it in the World Series a year ago. Shouldn’t C.J. be worth half that, and even if he is, would he even return here for half of Lee’s worth?

No, I now wouldn’t go $80 million, even if in August I wrote that the Rangers should. Then, however, I saw Wilson in the postseason. At the moment, C.J.’s worth will have to be determined by another team or teams.

If the Rangers don’t agree with that worth, then what are the alternatives? Roy Oswalt with his injury issues? Mark Buehrle? Definitely on Buehrle, but how high does that money go? The other alternative would be a major pitching trade, but those are always long-shot possibilities.

The Rangers need Wilson back, even if he’s probably not coming back.

But whatever happens next, there’s no reason to hate on C.J.

Source: http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view.bg?&articleid=1378315&format=&page=1&listingType=sco#articleFull

Share

Row over Lotus name in Formula One finally over as F1 Commission sanction three name changes

Row over Lotus name in Formula One finally over as F1 Commission sanction three name changes

Renault will next season be known as Lotus, Team Lotus will become Caterham and Virgin Racing are to become Marussia.

The changes still need be approved by the World Motor Sport Council, which convenes on December 7, but are unlikely to meet with any resistance. The F1 Commission is made up of 26 members, including FIA president Jean Todt, and is chaired by F1 chief executive Bernie Ecclestone.

There will be relief in the sport that the bewildering state of affairs as regards the Lotus marque – with both Team Lotus and Lotus Renault claiming it – has been resolved.

The dispute stretches back over two years to when Malaysian entrepreneur Tony Fernandes entered a team called Lotus Racing under licence from British carmaker Group Lotus.

When Group Lotus then revoked the licence and announced a £100 million seven-year sponsorship deal with Renault, with a view to becoming Lotus in a couple of years, Fernandes reverted to the historic Team Lotus name made famous by Colin Chapman.

The new QPR owner claimed to have bought the marque from David Hunt – brother of 1976 world champion James Hunt – although Hunt disputed whether he was ever fully paid for it. With neither side willing to back down, Team Lotus and Group Lotus fought a bitter court battle earlier this year to decide which of them had the rights to the name in Formula One.

Many millions of pounds later a High Court judge did not rule definitively in favour of one side or the other, telling them that Team Lotus could continue to race under that name but that Group Lotus retained the right to use the Lotus marque in F1 if it chose to enter its own team.

Fernandes, however, had by then already launched a backup plan by buying Dartford-based sports car manufacturer Caterham in April.

That led to new talks with Group Lotus, which ended with them submitting the joint request to change their names that was resolved yesterday.

Fernandes will now launch Caterham cars predominantly at the Asian market using the F1 team to push the brand, while Group Lotus will clearly use Formula One to sell its road cars.

There is even speculation that the Renault team’s owners, Luxembourg-based Genii Capital, may have bought Group Lotus from Malaysian manufacturer Proton, thus maintaining a direct interest in both the car manufacturer and the team.

As for Marussia, the Russian sports car manufacturer will now get the profile it hoped to get when it signed as Virgin Racing’s title sponsor last year. It struggled to make any inroads as long as the chassis name was Virgin since that is what commentators and journalists use to describe a team.

Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin brand will remain prominent on the car, with the British entrepreneur having signed a new four-year deal which will see him pay a certain amount in sponsorship, as well as attend a minimum number of races and help the team to find sponsors.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/motorsport/formulaone/8869278/Row-over-Lotus-name-in-Formula-One-finally-over-as-F1-Commission-sanction-three-name-changes.html

Share