‘Diesel’ producing fungus found



A tree-living fungus that produces a substance similar to diesel fuel has been discovered in South America.

Experts believe Gliocladium roseum could potentially be a completely new source of green energy.

Scientists were amazed to find that it was able to convert plant cellulose directly into the biofuel, dubbed “myco-diesel”

The fungus, which lives inside the Ulmo tree in the Patagonian rainforest, naturally produces hydrocarbon fuel similar to the diesel used to power cars and lorries.

Scientists were amazed to find that it was able to convert plant cellulose directly into the biofuel, dubbed “myco-diesel”.

Crops normally have to be converted to sugar and fermented before they can be turned into useful fuel.

Professor Gary Strobel, from Montana State University in the US, said: “G. roseum can make myco-diesel directly from cellulose, the main compound found in plants and paper. This means if the fungus was used to make fuel, a step in the production process could be skipped.”

Prof Strobel led an investigation into novel fungi in the rainforests of northern Patagonia, which cross the borders of Argentina and Chile.

He found that when the diesel fuel fungus was exposed to potentially toxic antibiotics, it reacted defensively by generating volatile gases.

“Then when we examined the gas composition of G. roseum, we were totally surprised to learn that it was making a plethora of hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon derivatives,” he said.

“The results were totally unexpected and very exciting and almost every hair on my arms stood on end.”

Cellulose provides the fibrous supporting structure of plants. During biofuel production, cellulose from plant waste is first treated with enzymes that turn it into sugar. Microbes then ferment the sugar into inflammable ethanol.

Nearly 430 million tonnes of plant waste is produced from farmland each year around the world.

Prof Strobel said: “We were very excited to discover that G. roseum can digest cellulose. Although the fungus makes less myco-diesel when it feeds on cellulose compared to sugars, new developments in fermentation technology and genetic manipulation could help improve the yield.

“In fact, the genes of the fungus are just as useful as the fungus itself in the development of new biofuels.”

Share

Simple device which uses electrical field to boost gas efficiency developed by Temple University researcher


With the high cost of gasoline and diesel fuel impacting costs for automobiles, trucks, buses and the overall economy, a Temple University physics professor has developed a simple device which could dramatically improve fuel efficiency as much as 20 percent.

According to Rongjia Tao, chair of Temple’s Physics Department, the small device consists of an electrically charged tube that can be attached to the fuel line of a car’s engine near the fuel injector. With the use of a power supply from the vehicle’s battery, the device creates an electric field that thins fuel, or reduces its viscosity, so that smaller droplets are injected into the engine. That leads to more efficient and cleaner combustion than a standard fuel injector, he says.

Six months of road testing in a diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz automobile showed that the device increased highway fuel from 32 miles per gallon to 38 mpg, a 20 percent boost, and a 12-15 percent gain in city driving.

The results of the laboratory and road tests verifying that this simple device can boost gas mileage was published in Energy & Fuels, a bi-monthly journal published by the American Chemical Society.

Photo by Joseph V. Labolito/Temple University
Rongjia Tao

“We expect the device will have wide applications on all types of internal combustion engines, present ones and future ones,” Tao wrote in the published study, “Electrorheology Leads to Efficient Combustion.”

Further improvements in the device could lead to even better mileage, he suggests, and cited engines powered by gasoline, biodiesel and kerosene as having potential use of the device.

Temple has applied for a patent on this technology, which has been licensed to California-based Save The World Air Inc., an environmentally conscientious enterprise focused on the design, development, and commercialization of revolutionary technologies targeted at reducing emissions from internal combustion engines.

According to Joe Dell, vice president of marketing for STWA, the company is currently working with a trucking company near Reading, Pa., to test the device on diesel-powered trucks, where he estimates it could increase fuel efficiency as much as 6-12 percent.

Dell predicts this type of increased fuel efficiency could save tens of billions of dollars in the trucking industry and have a major impact on the economy through the lowering of costs to deliver goods and services.

“Temple University is very excited about the translation of this new important technology from the research laboratory to the marketplace,” said Larry F. Lemanski, senior vice president for research and strategic initiatives at Temple. “This discovery promises to significantly improve fuel efficiency in all types of internal combustion engine powered vehicles and at the same time will have far-reaching effects in reducing pollution of our environment.”

NOTE: Copies of this study are available to working journalists and may be obtained by contacting Preston M. Moretz in Temple University’s Office of News Communications at 215-204-4380 or pmoretz@temple.edu.

A prototype of the original device is available for photos in Tao’s lab at Temple, while the current device being tested on the diesel trucks can be viewed by contacting STWA.

Share

Portable Solar Chargers 22 Watt & 15 Watt Solar Binders


If you need a portable solar charger for charging laptop, camcorder and other electronic devices and you want something more rugged and durable than flexible or foldable solar cells, our solar binders are a good choice.

22 Watt Folding Solar Binder

Our portable solar binder IP22B consists of a lightweight fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) solar module build into a high quality ballistic nylon notebook sized binder complete with shoulder strap and cigarette lighter receptacle with 10 foot cord which stores in an outside pocket.

You can charge cell phones, PDAs, camcorder or digital camera batteries, laptop computer batteries and more.  When used together with our Power Plant Notebook Battery, which fits inside the binder for carrying and storage, you have 5 amp hours of 12 volt DC power ready to go to work recharging or running your devices.  (See the special offer bottom of this page.)

Unzip the binder, lay it flat in full sun, plug in the car adapter cord and you can use the solar binder to charge your car or truck battery.

Specifications:

  • Maximum Power (Pmax): 22.7 watts

  • Voltage at Pmax (Vmp): 17.3 volts

  • Short circuit current (Isc): 2.20 amps

  • Open circuit voltage (Voc): 19.8 volts

  • Current Max (IPmax): 1.80 amps

  • Cell Type: Multicrystal

  • Cell Substrate: Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP)

  • Dimensions Closed: 16 x 13 x 3 inches

  • Dimensions Opened: 34 x 16 x 1/4 inches

  • Weight: 7 pounds

  • Power Output Connector: Female Cigarette Lighter Receptacle

15 Watt Folding Solar Binder

The 15 watt portable binder IP15B is a slightly smaller cousin to the 22 watt unit.  The features are identical.

Specifications:

  • Maximum Power (Pmax): 15.4 watts

  • Voltage at Pmax (Vmp): 17.3 volts

  • Short circuit current (Isc): 1.28 amps

  • Open circuit voltage (Voc): 19.8 volts

  • Current Max (IPmax): 1.17 amps

  • Cell Type: Multicrystal

  • Cell Substrate: Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP)

  • Dimensions Closed: 13-1/2 x 12 x 2 inches

  • Dimensions Opened: 24-1/2 x 13-1/2 x 3/4 inches

  • Weight: 2.9 pounds

  • Power Output Connector: Female Cigarette Lighter Receptacle

Operating Instructions

To power a device or recharge the battery of a device using the 22 or 15 watt Solar Binder, open the outside pocket flap and uncoil the 10 foot cord with female cigarette lighter receptacle.  Pull out as much cord as needed to attach to your device, making sure that the solar binder is in full sun as much as possible.

Unzip the binder and lay the solar modules as flat as possible.  Plug the male adapter from your device into the Solar Binder receptacle, then plug the other end of the charging cord into your device.

Depending on the time of day, time of year and the amount of full sun available, the solar module will begin to recharge the battery on your device.  The amount of charge varies with the available sunlight.  It will take from several hours to a full day of sun to recharge the batteries in most devices, and, in some cases, it could take more than one day.

You can generally run your device (i.e cell phone) while plugged into the Solar Binder, recharging the battery and using the device at the same time.  Depending on the load of the device you may be putting in less energy to the battery than you are using, so be alert to the battery status of your device.

Please contact us today for more information or assistance with your applications.

Share

New wind turbine spins success for winning student


A revolutionary new design for personal wind turbines wins top prize at the BSI Sustainability Design Awards 2007.

Ben Storan, a student graduating with an MA in Industrial Design Engineering from the Royal College of Art (RCA), has been working for the past year in conjunction with Imperial College to design an affordable personal wind turbine suited to the urban environment.

The result is a unique design which uses vertical, rather than traditional horizontal, rotation.  This feature gives a slower rotational speed, which allows the turbine to capture more energy from turbulent air flow, common to urban environments.  It also means quieter operation.

Ben Storan with his award winning personal wind turbine

Design of new wind turbine

Download image
Download image (high res 3MB)
Download image

Impression of what the turbine will look like fixed to a house

Design details of new personal wind turbine

Download imageDownload image

Impression of what the turbine will look like fixed to a house

Artist impression of scale of wind turbine

Download imageDownload image

As a result, it is able to generate more energy than domestic models currently on the market.  Similarly sized existing personal wind turbines claim to generate 1kW at a wind speed of 12 m/s, but typically produce just 40% of what is claimed.  Ben’s design should realistically produce 3 times that (1.2kW) of those currently on the market.

The clever vertical rotation design uses lightweight materials, which means Ben’s turbine is more stable than other personal turbines leading to better energy capture and making it is easier to install.

Speaking of winning the award and £3,000 first prize, Ben says “I’m delighted to win such a prestigious award.  Growing up in the windy west of Ireland I’ve always been acutely aware of the huge potential in harnessing such a free, clean and renewable source of energy which, along with a spinning clothes line, gave me the idea in the first place.”

Whilst still at the early stages of development, Ben hopes that his design will be in production in the not too distant future.

Runners-up in the BSI Sustainability Design Awards 2007 are Joe Wentworth for his retrofit folding handlebars which encourages cycling in urban environments where space for bike storage is at a premium, and Andreas Zachariah for his “Carbon Hero™” personal carbon calculator.

Share

Economics of Compact Fluorescent Lamps



compact-fluorescent1.jpgSometimes understanding the value to paying more can help put things into perspective. Yes, buying compact fluorescent bulbs is more expensive, but only in the short run.

Let’s assume that you’re using a 23w compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) to replace a 75w incandescent bulb and that the CFL has an 8,000 hour lifespan. 75-23= 52w saved per bulb replaced. 52x *8(kw)*.1(kw/h cost)= $41.6 saved in energy costs over the life of the CFL. Not bad.

But wait, there’s more! We now need to figure in the savings of not having to replace the incandescent bulb. Assuming the bulb has a life of 1,000 hours, we saved replacing 8 bulbs and at a cost of $.5 each, that’s an extra $4 saved. $41.6+4 = $45.6 saved by using the CFL.

$45.6 – $3 (for the cost of the CF)L is a total savings of $42.6.

Average payback period is:
$45.6/8000 = .0057

3/.0057 = 526 hours of lamp usage. That’s 132 days if the lamp is on for 4 hours per day. Nice.

Share

Why Electric Utilities Avoid Solar Power



By Sid of Stone Marmot

Why do the electric utilities have few solar power facilities? Why do they invest so little in solar power? Why will they probably never have major solar power facilities?

The simple answer is that they have great difficulty competing with homeowner sited solar power systems for the following reasons:

The main reason is that, for most methods presently used by power companies to generate electricity, the costs of generating electricity drop dramatically as the power generator is scaled up in size. Anyone who has an internal combustion engine powered electric generator, be it gasoline, diesel, propane, etc., fueled, will quickly realize that running costs are much more than for what they pay for utility provided electricity. Even wind turbines become much more cost effective as their diameters are increased and their towers increase in size.

This is not true for solar power, at least with the photovoltaic solar cells we presently associate with solar power. The panels the power utilities would use are the same as what the homeowner would use. The only possible savings the power utilities would have would be with volume discounts in purchasing the solar panels. This savings is canceled out by all the extra costs the power companies have, like purchasing and maintaining the land for these panels (effectively free for homeowners), the transmission and distribution costs (virtually nonexistent for homeowners), billing department (nonexistent for homeowners), making up for transmission losses (presently about 7 % of all electricity generated is lost in transmission, plus the additional losses in scaling inherently low voltage DC solar power for more efficient high voltage AC transmission), and others (legal, accounting, benefits, lobbying, executive salaries, stockholders’ returns, etc.). If the utilities tried to generate major solar power facilities, many of their potential customers will quickly realize that they can generate their own solar power as cheap or even cheaper than the power companies can provide it.

Private households can, and some do, generate hydroelectric power as cheap or even cheaper than the major utilities. But far less than 0.1 % of the households in the US have sites suitable for generating hydroelectric power. So these are not much of a threat to the utilities.

Another reason is that many of the utilities’ potential customers will also realize that they have more control over the reliability of the power if they do it themselves. During a major storm, usually the number of houses that lose their electric power is much greater than those that have any major damage to them. If the house doesn’t have any major damage, it would probably also still have a functioning solar power system. With your own solar power system, overloads caused by your neighbors, auto accidents, a tree falling a mile from you, terrorism, etc., won’t have any affect on your electric service.

Another reason is that many of the present methods of generating electricity used by power companies are not available to private individuals. I doubt that any individual could legally have their own nuclear power plant. A household size coal fired electric plant is rather impractical, especially if you include the antipollution devices. Also, I doubt that the government would want to try to regulate and inspect and verify millions of household coal fired plants to assure they are meeting environmental standards. It is hard enough trying to control a relative handful of utility power plants. But this is not true for solar power. A private household could install a solar electric system easier and faster with little potential environmental problems than any power company could build a reasonable size solar power facility.

Aesthetics also limit the potential use of other potential home power systems. Few people would tolerate a noisy, smelly internal combustion engine electric generator operating by them 24 hours a day except in emergency situations. Many complain about tall wind towers with their fast moving parts near their property. But solar power is silent, often part of the house, with no moving parts.

Solar electric power is ideally suited for distributed generation, that is, generation at the place it is being used. It scales very easily from very small systems, like pocket calculators, on up. Efficiency is much greater with reduced transmission distances and less voltage conversions. So solar power isn’t that well suited for centralized generation, like most of our present electrical systems.

This scares power companies. Presently, they have monopoly control over the whole electric power system. With solar power, it is much more efficient and cost effective for the power generation to be resident at the homes and businesses that use the power.

There still may be a place for the power companies in providing an interconnect between users so that they have a backup if they have to take down their own systems for some maintenance or if they need extra power for some special situation, such as a party or to accommodate extra needs due to guests. But this is a much smaller and more optional market as many would have no need for hookup to the utility grid.

The power companies could also lease solar installations to private homeowners and businesses and maintain these systems. Many would probably welcome and take advantage of this service. But other small private businesses could also provide this same service just as effectively, so the power companies would have much more competition.

Also, the utilities would probably still be needed in places with little or unreliable solar power. Their larger generating facilities may also be better suited for satisfying the needs of very electricity intensive industries, such as aluminum manufacturing.

Consequently, you will never see the major power companies make major efforts in developing or providing solar power. They would be effectively slitting their own throats, business-wise. In fact, as solar power starts to become more popular, you with probably find the utilities trying to block it or take control of it.

Share

67% Of Consumers Willing To Pay More For Green Power



Sixty-seven percent of consumers polled across six countries – Australia, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States – would be more willing to pay for eco-friendly energy, according to Plugging in the Consumer: Innovating utility business models for the future, a report from IBM Global Business Services that forecasts how changes in energy customers’ expectations will impact the utility industry’s business model in the next five to ten years.

Australians are most willing to pay a premium for green power, but, surprisingly, Americans are most willing to pay a sizable premium, up to an additional 20 percent or more.

But while the environment is important, cost and quality are still more important considerations for consumers in their choice of products.
ibm2.jpg
While carbon footprints and other analyses of personal environmental impact have attracted widespread attention, 75 percent of consumers surveyed outside the U.S. have not performed one – and only 15 percent of U.S. consumers have done this.

Most consumers want the option to choose their electric or gas utility provider (83 percent of those surveyed), but the majority reported either they cannot or do not know they can. A full one quarter of consumers who have renewable power options available to them actually purchase renewable power, and most of those who do not have renewable power options (65 percent) said they would like the option to do so.
ibm1-1.jpg
The survey also found that the promise of reduced energy costs would impact how and when consumers heat and cool their homes, do their laundry and cook their meals. Of those surveyed, 84 percent said that a 50 percent reduction in energy cost during off-peak hours was the most important. Sixty-one percent would change their energy-consuming behavior in response to claims that there would be a positive environmental impact from such changes, and this would rise to 65 percent if such benefits could be demonstrated.

Share

Generate your own power



I dug up some old electricity bills the other day to check how much juice we have been using over the past few years. I was shocked by the numbers I found, we use about 10500 kWh a year which equals a constant load of (10500 kWh / 365 days / 24 hours =) 1.2 kW or 1200 Watts. The power usage itself isn’t the shocking part, considering we use electricity to cook on, have a bunch of other appliances that are used regularly and a few tropical aquariums, one of which is a saltwater aquarium which has some quite powerful lights and pumps. What did shock me was to see the total money spend on electricity. With a kWh costing about 24 cents, the total yearly cost for our electricity usage ads up to 2.5 grand (that is Euros, which equals about 3,700 US$!!!)

There are better things to do with that kind of money but we still need the electricity. Sure, we can probably cut down on usage, but quite frankly there are not a lot of electric comforts I want to give up. I will use an average of 1000 Watts of power usage to figure out what kind of power plant we need to build. If I take into account the small fish farm we might want to start, that adds another 1000 Watts.

I’ve already ruled out solar power because the up front costs will be too high. I do want to tap into the power that the sun delivers for free, but I will use that for heating instead of electricity generation. Wind power is another free source, but since it depends on the weather conditions I’m not too keen on that either. I will probably experiment with wind power in the near future but for now I need a better, more constant, source.

lister.jpgI am having a closer look at Lister-engines and the more I read about them, the more I like them. A Lister CS (cold start) engine is a diesel engine that can deliver great power for very little cost. These engines are build to run for decades, I’ve read about some that have been running 24/7 for over 40 years! And the required maintenance is very low. These engines run at low speeds of 600 – 1000 RPM, making them less noisy than regular diesel generators.

Running an engines like this hooked up to a 10 kW power generator for about 5 hours a day would be able to cover my total power consumption. The heat generated by the engine can be fed back into the central heating system. Using the generated heat would be another big money saver considering the huge increase in oil prices, currently at $95 a barrel vs. $52 per barrel in January! The oil price does not affect the running cost of the generator as it can run on waste vegetable oil, which can be collected from local restaurants for free. The restaurant owners normally have to pay to get their used cooking oil disposed of.

Since the electricity generated by the generator would be somewhat constant while it is running and the usage has spikes as appliances get turned on and off, a buffer is needed to store the generated power, so it can be used at times when the generator is not running. One way to store your electricity is in batteries, but since most homes here are connected to the electric grid, we can just use that! Solar systems are often hooked up to the grid like this, by using a special electricity meter you can have the meter run backwards when you generate more power than you use. If we feed enough power back into the grid we can start sending bills to the power company, much better than receiving their bills!

Share

Toshiba Unveils Miniature Nuclear Reactors



In the past, there have been few options for isolated areas to generate electricity. For small, out of the way towns and large industrial complexes located off the beaten path, combustion generators powered by natural gas or diesel have been the only choice.

But recently, the engineers at Toshiba have presented a new option, miniature nuclear reactors. Small potatoes when compared to their 1,500 MW cousins, these tiny 50 MW units would still be able to supply power to as many as 40,000 homes in areas far from the existing power grid.

With no need to refuel and no need for the expensive power lines required to deliver energy over long distances, these small nuclear reactors offer an environmentally friendly, cost effective, and above all reliable means to power these remote areas with little to no environmental footprint.

But these are not your Grandfather’s fission reactors. These units are self contained and use liquid Lithium-6 as a moderator instead of the Control Rods used by the larger reactors we are used to. For those of you who are new to the technology, in this case a moderator is a substance with a neutron affinity or ‘appetite’ for neutrons. They regulate the rate of fission in the same way regulating oxygen controls the rate at which a fire burns. No air, no fire – no neutrons, no fission. The fail safe design of these reactors causes the unit to automatically flood with Lithium-6 during a transient in order to “snuff out” the reaction by depriving it of the neutrons needed to continue fission.

Obviously, any new technology will have to endure the fears and lack of understanding by the under-informed. However, since 9/11 and the dramatic rise in oil prices, public opinion is finally warming to a technology that has been unjustly loathed for decades. With this waning fear and opposition to clean, safe nuclear power, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expected to consider this type of reactor sometime within the next ten years.

~Man Overboard

Share